Types of Employment Discrimination
Share/Bookmark
The following types of discrimination are illegal in the United States, and workers can sue their employers for failing to protect their employees from these types of discrimination. Employees have a right to be free from retaliation for their opposition to discrimination or for filing a charge, testifying, assisting, or otherwise participating in an EEOC proceeding.
 
Age Discrimination

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA's protections apply to both employees and job applicants. Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his/her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training.

Disability Discrimination

Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. 

Equal Pay and Compensation Discrimination

The right of employees to be free from discrimination in their compensation is protected under several federal laws, including the following enforced by the EEOC: the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The Equal Pay Act requires that men and women be given equal pay for equal work in the same establishment. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal. It is job content, not job titles, that determines whether jobs are substantially equal. 

National Origin Discrimination

Whether an employee or job applicant's ancestry is Mexican, Ukrainian, Filipino, Arab, American Indian, or any other nationality, he or she is entitled to the same employment opportunities as anyone else. EEOC enforces the federal prohibition against national origin discrimination in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers employers with 15 or more employees.  National origin discrimination means treating someone less favorably because he or she comes from a particular place, because of his or her ethnicity or accent, or because it is believed that he or she has a particular ethnic background. National origin discrimination also means treating someone less favorably at work because of marriage or other association with someone of a particular nationality.

Pregnancy Discrimination

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions constitutes unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII, which covers employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. Title VII also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal government. Women who are pregnant or affected by related conditions must be treated in the same manner as other applicants or employees with similar abilities or limitations.

Title VII's pregnancy-related protections include: hiring, pregnancy and maternity leave, health insurance, and fringe benefits.

Race Discrimination 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion.  Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied any person because of his/her racial group or perceived racial group, his/her race-linked characteristics (e.g., hair texture, color, facial features), or because of his/her marriage to or association with someone of a particular race or color. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.

Title VII's prohibitions apply regardless of whether the discrimination is directed at Whites, Blacks, Asians, Latinos, Arabs, Native Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders, multi-racial individuals, or persons of any other race, color, or ethnicity.  It is unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any individual in regard to recruiting, hiring, and advancement; harassment/hostile work environment; compensation and other employment terms; conditions, and privileges; and segregation and classification of employees.
 

Religious Discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion in hiring, firing, and other terms and conditions of employment. Under Title VII:

  • Employers may not treat employees or applicants more or less favorably because of their religious beliefs or practices - except to the extent a religious accommodation is warranted. 
  • Employees cannot be forced to participate -- or not participate -- in a religious activity as a condition of employment.
  • Employers must permit employees to engage in religious expression, unless the religious expression would impose an undue hardship on the employer.
Sex-Based Discrimination

It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of his/her sex in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals on the basis of sex. Title VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately exclude individuals on the basis of sex and that are not job related.  The prohibitions against sex-based discrimination also cover sexual harassment.

 

RATE MY BOSS 


Featured Jobs


Search Jobs

Recent News

Jury awards $17,500 to former lifeguard who filed retaliation lawsuit

Bad boss costs Grace Episcopal Church $200,000 in sexual harassment settlement

San Juan School District Superintendent put on administrative leave during investigation of hostile work environment allegations

Triumph Group sued for male-on-male sexual harassment by bad boss

City of Littleton to pay $90,000 to settle police department retaliation lawsuit

Prostitute claims discrimination in being banned from LinkedIn

Former Iowa Senate Republican Caucus employee to file sexual harassment lawsuit

EEOC files race discrimination lawsuit against Mississippi pizza restaurant

Sexual harassment complaints lead to resignation of NY Assemblyman Vito Lopez

Disability discrimination lawsuit costs BMO Harris Bank $400,000

Find us on Google+
 
 
 
Site Map  | Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use  | Disclaimer  |Copyright Information
Copyright © 2007-2013,eBossWatch.com. All rights reserved.